On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:09:00 +0200, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote: > Stargaming wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote: > >>> While in a syntax like: >>> for i in xrange(1_000_000): >>> my eyes help me group them at once. >> >> Sounds like a good thing to be but the arbitrary positioning >> doesnt make any sense. > > Checking underscore positions would only add complexity. Why not > just ignore them, no matter where they are?
Underscores in numerics are UGLY. Why not take a leaf out of implicit string concatenation and allow numeric literals to implicitly concatenate? Python already does: "hello-" "world" => "hello-world" Propose: 123 456 789 => 123456789 123.456 789 => 123.456789 -- Steven. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
