Wayne Brehaut a écrit : > On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:12:04 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>J. Clifford Dyer a écrit : (snip) >>>Well, it's also unpythonic to start numbering a sequence at 1, but >>>it's clearly the right thing to do in this case. >> >>As far as I'm concerned, if I had to number a magazine about >>programming, I'd obviously start with 0. > > And since the "first" issue is free that would be best here too. > >>Then it would be n°1, n°10, >>n°11, n°100 etc !-) > > But probably with enough leading zeros to last the expected lifetime > (8 bits should about do it?) so they'd sort properly: > > 0000 0000 > 0000 0001 > etc.
Mmm... sort of reminds me of y2k. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
