On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:52:13 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wayne Brehaut a écrit : >> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:12:04 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>J. Clifford Dyer a écrit : >(snip) >>>>Well, it's also unpythonic to start numbering a sequence at 1, but >>>>it's clearly the right thing to do in this case. >>> >>>As far as I'm concerned, if I had to number a magazine about >>>programming, I'd obviously start with 0. >> >> And since the "first" issue is free that would be best here too. >> >>>Then it would be n°1, n°10, >>>n°11, n°100 etc !-) >> >> But probably with enough leading zeros to last the expected lifetime >> (8 bits should about do it?) so they'd sort properly: >> >> 0000 0000 >> 0000 0001 >> etc. > >Mmm... sort of reminds me of y2k. Funny, I was thinking IPv4. www -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
