Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google > "reply-to considered harmful" for a variety of opinions, for and > against.
The arguments in support of munging have been defeated, since 2001. Munging the "Reply-To" field is in violation of standards, and completely unnecessary. Any remaining lack is for the mail user agent provider to fix, in accordance with standards. <URL:http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html> -- \ "I wrote a song, but I can't read music so I don't know what it | `\ is. Every once in a while I'll be listening to the radio and I | _o__) say, 'I think I might have written that.'" -- Steven Wright | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list