On Oct 24, 8:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Oct 24, 7:09 am, Alexandre Badez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm just wondering, if I could write a in a "better" way this code > > > lMandatory = [] > > lOptional = [] > > for arg in cls.dArguments: > > if arg is True: > > lMandatory.append(arg) > > else: > > lOptional.append(arg) > > return (lMandatory, lOptional) > > > I think there is a better way, but I can't see how... > > You might look into list comprehensions. You could probably do this > with two of them: > > <code> > # completely untested > lMandatory = [arg for arg in cls.dArguments if arg is True] > lOptional = [arg for arg in cls.dArguments if arg is False] > </code> > > Something like that. I'm not the best with list comprehensions, so I > may have the syntax just slightly off. See the following links for > more information: > > http://www.secnetix.de/olli/Python/list_comprehensions.hawkhttp://docs.python.org/tut/node7.html > > Mike
After reading the others replies, it makes me think that I'm barking up the wrong tree. Ah well. Mike -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
