Bjoern Schliessmann wrote: > The inconsistencies arise, IMHO, if an OO language introduces > non-object types for performance reasons, after that gets wrapper > classes to wrap those primitives, and even later gets the ability > to automatically cast a primitive into a wrapper class instance. > That's just ugly. > If you mean Java, then just say Java.
;) /W -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
