"Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Overall, I'd say you don't stand a chance that your proposals will be >adopted. They are minor variations of things that have been proposed & >rejected too often to count - and to be honest: it get's tiresome >beating the same old horses again and again...
That's a bad sign. A language like Python attracts new people all the time, and those people are going to go through the same evolutionary learning processes that the long-timers did. They are entitled to rediscover the things that have already been discovered. It's fine to say "those ideas have been proposed and rejected, see the PEPs", but I hope this group retains the tolerance that I have long admired. -- Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
