Duncan Booth wrote: > Unfortunately as currently implemented, getter setter and deleter just > update the existing property, so the getter defined in B changes how the > property works in A as well. I think the intention may have been that they > should create a new property each time, but this isn't what has been > implemented.
Thanks for the information! I've talked to Guido and we both agree that it is a bug. I've a pending fix for it at my hands. Christian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
