On Dec 19, 1:26 pm, Markus Dahlbokum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just want the qt libs linked to the interpreter without accessing them > > > by a module. I tried the configure option '--with-libs='lib ...''. The > > > make did fine but the executable is too small and the qt symbols are not > > > known by it. How can I just link qt statically? > > > Why do you want to do this? If qt isn't actually *used* in Python (as > > you don't include the pyqt modules), what effect do you expect from > > such linking? > > > I think it linked just fine - it just didn't include any symbols, > > because none were needed. That is the correct, expected behavior. > > It all worked fine. > > > Regards, > > Martin > > I need an environment that can be delivered to our customers without > installing python, qt and pyqt. We want to provide the complete package. > In order to do so I need to link at least python and qt. How can this be done? > > Of course a complete package with python, qt and pyqt would be the best > solution but there seem to be even more complications that way. If you can > help me with this I would be very grateful.
If it's for windows, py2exe works like a charm for this kind of setup. For windows + linux, you might one to try one of: http://www.freehackers.org/Packaging_a_python_program -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list