On Feb 8, 6:50 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sometimes, it's more appropriate to write
>
> @call
> def f():
> normal_suite()
>
> than
>
> def f():
> normal_suite()
> f().
>
> It's clearer to the eye and reader, and truer to the meaning of the
> code. From reading the docs, it's pretty clear that it's not what the
> author meant for decorators. So, even though it's good and practical,
> as well as Pythonic, it doesn't get in.
As I remarked in a recent post, it's already almost in, but it's
called '@apply' (I don't know what your @call returns):
@apply
def the_answer(x=6):
return x*(x+1)
print the_answer
:-)
--
Arnaud
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
