Thus spake Matthieu Brucher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > How does it compare to the nose framework ?
As far as the base unit testing functionality is concerned, I think they try to address similar problems. Both have assert-based testing with inspection and re-parsing of assert exceptions for better error messages. Both try to provide better fixture management. Both make programmatic test generation easier. Both have a command-line tool for running and gathering tests. I like nose, but I'm biased, and of course I think Pry has some advantages. One difference I'd point out is Pry's tree-based test structure, which provides a number of conveniences and features (much nicer test selection from the command line, for instance). Pry is also less than half the size of nose, and should therefore be simpler to extend and understand. At any rate, feel free to take a look at Pry and see what you think. Regards, Aldo -- Aldo Cortesi Managing Director M: +61 419 492 863 P: +61 1300 887 007 W: www.nullcube.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
