On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 23:06:23 -0700 (PDT) CM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You misunderstood me, but completely understandably. I meant that > a) the OP wanted to use Django, and so I was giving the word on the > only database engines that would work with that and b) the OP wanted > to use a relational database, and therefore would have to use SQL
While most database systems require SQL, the type of database and the query language used are are not as tightly coupled as you imply. I did quite a bit of work in Progres DB in a 4GL that was not SQL although SQL was an optional extra. The original query language for PostgreSQL and its predeccessor was QUEL, not SQL. There are other examples. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL#Alternatives_to_SQL for some. This is not to say that learning SQL is a bad idea. It is certainly the de facto standard today. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
