Daniel Fetchinson wrote: > I'm sorry to disappoint you but this project has already been completed: > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
Daniel, PEP 8 is anything but complete. How much of the following simple question can you answer from there: Given that you can name things with UpperAndLower, lowerAndUpper, lower_and_underscore, etc., what is the convention for naming packages, modules, classes, ... PEP 8 very much reminds me of Sun's Java conventions - a start, but only a start. Also, in part, controversial. (How wide do you think Python code should be?) Finally, lacking in basic organization. (This seems to be a disease that infects almost all standards.) We can do better. As a guess, GvR would be happy to have someone fill out PEP 8. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
