En Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:52:11 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Daniel Fetchinson wrote: >> I'm sorry to disappoint you but this project has already been completed: >> >> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ > > Daniel, PEP 8 is anything but complete. How much of the following > simple question can you answer from there: > > Given that you can name things with UpperAndLower, lowerAndUpper, > lower_and_underscore, etc., what is the convention for naming > packages, modules, classes, ... > > PEP 8 very much reminds me of Sun's Java conventions - a start, but > only a start. Also, in part, controversial. (How wide do you think > Python code should be?) Finally, lacking in basic organization. (This > seems to be a disease that infects almost all standards.) We can do > better. As a guess, GvR would be happy to have someone fill out PEP 8.
This feels like a dejà-vu... Your thread from last January: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/96fac33ed9d601b7/ If you like doing these kind of things, go ahead and summarize them. You have more than 30 style guides to start with. Enjoy. -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list