On Apr 17, 1:18 am, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 17, 3:37 am, Jonathan Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > If you can't rewrite > > your algorithm to be disk or network bound, next optimization step is > > C. > > I'm sorry, but I don't like being told to use C. Perhaps I would like > the expressiveness of Python, am willing to accept the cost in > performance, but would also like to take advantage of technology to > get performance gains when I can? What's so unreasonable about that? >
If you're satisfied then don't take the next optimization step. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
