Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 12, 1:30 pm, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Duncan Booth wrote:
> [...]
>> > I think the variant I came up with is a bit clearer:
>>
>> > for i in range(1,101):
>> > print '%s%s' % ('' if i%3 else 'Fizz', '' if i%5 else
>> > 'Buzz') or
> i
>>
>> More than a bit clearer, IMO. How about
>> print ('' if i%3 else 'Fizz') + ('' if i%5 else 'Buzz') or
>> i (or perhaps
>> print (('' if i%3 else 'Fizz') + ('' if i%5 else 'Buzz'))
>> or i to save looking up the precedence rules) ?
>
> Stuff clarity! How about
>
> for i in xrange(1, 101):
> print 'FizzBuzz'[4*(i%3>0):4+4*(i%5<1)] or i
>
> --
> Arnaud
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>
With no loop:
i=1
exec"print'FizzBuzz'[4*(i%3>0):4+4*(i%5<1)]or i;i+=1;"*100
max
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
