Antoon Pardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The answers seemed to be negative. Since I really would like this > behaviour
I didn't see you explain *why* you think this behaviour is desirable. You've already had responses that explained why it leaves you open to more bugs when code only works if tests run in a specific order. > Are other people interrested in this behaviour? > Does the following patch has a chance of being introduced in the > standard python distribution? No and no. If anything, unit test cases should be run in a completely *non*-deterministic sequence. -- \ "In prayer, it is better to have a heart without words than | `\ words without heart." -- Mahatma Gandhi | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
