On May 24, 3:57 pm, Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Whilst I understand your point, I think the danger is that you end up > > with hidden dependencies on the test order - which you're not aware of > > and that the tests never expose. > > Well, yes. But, this is no worse than the current situation, where the > tests are run in alphabetical order by default. You could still have > hidden dependencies and not realize it.
Fair point. I'd still be -1 on the addition of this patch, but +1 on the addition of a randomizer. Michael Foord http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
