[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ben Keshet:
>> ...wrong. I thought I should omit the comma and didn't put it. I guess
>> that stating the obvious should be the first attempt with beginners like
>> me. Thanks for thinking about it (it's running perfect now).
>
> In CLisp, Scheme etc, lists such commas aren't necessary, but in
> Python if you don't separate strings with a comma they become merged
> into a single string:
>
>>>> 'foo', 'bar'
> ('foo', 'bar')
>>>> 'foo' 'bar'
> 'foobar'
>
> Your mistake is caused by Python not following one of its general
> rules:
>
> Explicit is better than implicit.
>
> In such case the string concatenation (+) is done implicitly. It's a
> little handy feature once in a while (but not for me so far), while it
> may cause bugs, so I don't like this little feature of Python and I
> may like to see it removed, because it may bite you in similar
> situations, where you forgot a comma for mistake:
>
> parts = ["foo", "bar" "baz"]
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
It's useful when wrapping a line. For lack of better lorem ipsum:
whatever = some_function("Your mistake is caused by Python not "
"following one of its general rules:\n\n"
"Explicit is better than implicit.")
You can also use backslashes, and probably even + if you want to, but
the implicit concatenation is prettier (IMO, at least ;-).
But you do have a point. I have never thought about the problems it
could cause.
BTW, I could easily be wrong, but I think C behaves the same way as Python.
--
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
