2008/9/28 process <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have heard some criticism about Python, that it is not fully object- > oriented.
Why is that a criticism? OO is a tool, not a religion (ok, ok, OO *should be* a tool, not a religion). Is it a criticism of a hammer that it is not a screwdriver? Or do you pick the tool that does the job in hand most effectively? -- Tim Rowe -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
