George Sakkis: > I don't see the same value in creating a distinction between methods > and builtin functions unless the latter are truly generic (and even > then I wouldn't mind having them as methods of the base object class, > e.g. object.type()). Having a builtin len(x) delegate to x.__len__() > seems harder to justify.
I have shown few usage examples of the len() one of the posts in this thread. Can you take a look at them and show how you can better rewrite them without a len function? Bye, bearophile -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
