Ben Finney wrote:
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We're not going to add the "feature" back that None compares smaller
than everything. It's a slippery slope that ends with all operations
involving None returning None -- I've seen a proposal made in all
earnestness requesting that None+42 == None, None() == None, and so
on. This Nonesense was wisely rejected
I agree with that decision. However, the behaviour you specify *is*
For the record, I was quoting Guido there.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
