Andreas Roehler wrote: > IMO Jeremiah Dodds is right. With all the time spent on this discussion, you > could write the needed function in elisp probably. BTW your request seems > reasonable. Other python programmers may use it too.
I tried learning lisp about 15 years ago. even bought a copy of the little lisper. after a few days, I gave up because there was just too much learning curve for the reward. I know that sounds a touch arrogant but in truth, I'd prefer to put my energy into building a better bridge between NaturallySpeaking and linux apps. bigger pay off helping more people. with reguard to emacs changes I hope for and would appreciate it if someone would partner up with me and help build these (and other) changes into python mode. I will also point out that if another IDE is better suited, I'm open to that too. > Anyway you should tell, which python-mode and which Emacs you use if any. This is GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2008-09-08 on LENNART-69DE564 (patched) and I'm using the python mode that came with emacs. no version number but... ;;; python.el --- silly walks for Python -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*- ;; Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ;; Author: Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ;; Maintainer: FSF ;; Created: Nov 2003 ;; Keywords: languages > > Andreas Röhler -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list