Paul Rubin a écrit :
Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid> writes:
I haven't anywhere in this thread as far as I know suggested
eliminating dynamism from Python,
Nope, but your suggestion would have the same practical result as far
as I'm concerned.
Sorry, I don't comprehend that.
IIRC, your suggestion was that one should have to explicitely allow
"dynamic binding" (ie: outside the initializer) of new attributes, and
that the default vould be to disallow them. That's at least what I
understood from :
"""
There are cases where this is useful but they're not terribly common.
I think it would be an improvement if creating new object attributes
was by default not allowed outside the __init__ method. In the cases
where you really do want to create new attributes elsewhere, you'd
have to explicitly enable this at instance creation time, for example
by inheriting from a special superclass:
class Foo (DynamicAttributes, object): pass
"""
(snip)
Python already had such a change when it deprecated and later got rid
of string exceptions.
I really don't get how this would be comparable with the above
suggestion. I can well understand your concerns wrt/ Python's
performances (even if I don't agree on your proposed solutions), but
this one "argument" really looks like a straw man.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
