Bruno Desthuilliers <bdesth.quelquech...@free.quelquepart.fr> writes: > > We're not talking about libraries here. > > Yes we are. If the default is "non-dynamic", then a class author is in > charge of explicitely allowing it when *he* see fits.
Oh, I see what you mean, the standard libraries would be affected if the language default were to tone down the dynamism. True. > As long as it's up to the *user* to choose, that's ok. Your "@dynamic" > class decorator doesn't have the same implications. Well, you could use it on library classes too: from library import Libclass Libclass = dynamic(Libclass) ... would be like using the decorator on the class definition. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
