On Jan 24, 12:24 pm, Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 24, 12:33 am, Hrvoje Niksic <hnik...@xemacs.org> wrote: > > > Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Anyway, all you're doing is distracting attention from my claim that > > > instance objects wouldn't need to be locked. They wouldn't, no > > > matter how mutable you insist these objects whose bits would never > > > change are. > > > Only if you're not implementing Python, but another language that > > doesn't support __slots__ and assignment to instance.__dict__. > > I am only going to say all Python types prior to 3.0 support classes > without __slots__,
I made a mistake, and I don't want to risk confusion at this point. "all Python ***versions** prior to 3.0" and I am talking about old-style classes, of course. Prior to 2.2 no classes at all supported slots. Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
