On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:23:32 +0000, John O'Hagan wrote:
> > Beyond being part of a conventionally-ordered set of keys, what can an
> > ordinality of zero actually mean? (That's a sincere question.)
>

[snip erudite definition of cardinality]

> For non-infinite sets, you can treat ordinal numbers and cardinal numbers
> as more or less identical. So an ordinality of zero just means the number
> of elements of something that doesn't exist.

This is the bit I don't get - I had thought of ordinality as something 
attached to each item - ['a','b','c'] has a cardinality of 3, and elements of 
ordinality 1, 2 and 3 (first,second, third) respectively. So it's possible to 
have a cardinality of zero (an empty sequence does) but only "something that 
doesn't exist" can have an ordinality of zero; as soon as there is an item, 
its ordinality is 1. Shoot me down, please!

> How that relates to whether indexing should start at one or zero, I have
> no idea.
 
Only insofar as the "weirdness" of indexing being out of step with 
ordinality/cardinality matters, i.e. not that much. :)

John



--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to