Ben Finney wrote:
Astley Le Jasper <astley.lejas...@gmail.com> writes:
I've just stumbled over this (http://showmedo.com/) and being the very
visual person I am, it seems like it could be a good way to learn
about python. However, before I smack down $60, I wondered if anyone
had any opinions on it. My gut feel is that it could be pretty good.
I commend you on your prudence.
The site makes a big deal about helping people with free software. But
their videos are in non-free formats, with Flash being the only option I
could see.
The content appears only to play *in* a browser (I couldn't find any
download links to watch the video offline), making it a pain for anyone
without extremely fast internet.
They require Yet Another Bloody Site-specific Authentication, instead of
allowing login with an existing OpenID as provided by any of the
hundreds of millions of accounts people already have.
Those barriers are enough that I haven't yet *seen* any of their content
to know if it's worth paying for.
I'd like to defend showmedo a bit here.
First, re: UI. If I go to the front page and see something in the
'incoming tutorials' section on the right that interests me, and
click on it, (let's say, python beginners - file i/o), I get to
the page that indeed does not start showing a video right away,
but that makes sense because most topics contain a number of collections
of videos, since you don't know which of these a visitor wants to see,
you have to show him the choices. On this page I immediately see a
'video tutorials' section on the left, where you can either click on
title or the image thumbnail. On the next page I see a thumbnail that
has a 'play' arrow overlayed on it and 'click to play' in bold font.
It's the most noticeable item on the page. If you click on that, it
brings up a video screen that - here I have to agree this is one click
too many - you have to again click to start the video, however, in my
experience, this is very common on sites that embed video players, I'd
say about 60-70% of them will ask you to make that extra click to start
playing. That video player screen has a play arrow overlayed over it and
also common video controls on the bottom, so it's really a no-brainer to
click on the play arrow in the center or on the play arrow on one of the
controls.
All of this took me no more than 4-5 seconds to get to the video. I did
visit the site before but when I was on my first visit, it did not take
any longer than that, either.
So, if using these videos saves me more than 4-5 seconds of learning
time, I'm already ahead.
Secondly, in regard to use of flash videos: if you have a slow
connection you can pause the video and wait for it to buffer fully. I
haven't worked with free alternatives to flash so I can't comment on
that, it's a matter of how mature are the free/open tools to do the same
thing as flash authoring software and how easy it is to install them on
firefox and IE. If they're hard to install on IE, it seems reasonable
to me to use flash, because otherwise you'll seem too elite and
exclusive and push away too many well-meaning people.
Re: site specific auth. You don't need that to watch videos. You need it
for some other things like downloading them--as I mentioned above, you
can prebuffer video if you have a slower connection, so downloading them
is not really crucial. Even if you do want to set up an account, it
should not take longer than a couple of minutes. The way I think about
this is I try to look at the benefit provided by the site and the cost
of using the site: some of these videos are very good and I'm sure that
they saved me many hours of slower book learning, therefore spending 2
minutes on registration would be well worth it (although I did not
register because I had no need for that). They could set up the OpenID
thing but with limited time I think it's more useful to create new
content rather than work on such non-essential niceties (although I
really don't know how much effort it is to add OpenID support...)
All in all, nothing in this world is 100% perfect and this site provides
great content for free (well, most of it), and it's obvious that
creators spent hundreds of hours of their time to make this available to
community and paid content will only probably recoup the hosting fees if
that. So, how about a little kudos where it's due? A bit less nitpicking
and a bit more appreciation?
Just my humble opinion, that's all. (I'm not connected to the site in
any way, I did watch a few dozen videos some time ago).
-ak (rainy)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
