Re: Nimrod programming language

[rumpf_a]

> > > The language and library are missing arbitrary precision integer
> > > arithmetic, using GMP or something like that.
>
> > True, but currently not a high priority for me.
>
> Too bad. That makes Nimrod officially "worthless", i.e., of no
> value to me.
>
Well, you could write a wrapper for GMP (and contribute to the
project ;-)).
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list