On Jul 30, 12:04 am, alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 30, 1:06 pm, r <rt8...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 1.) No need to use "()" to call a function with no arguments. > > Python --> "obj.m2().m3()" --ugly > > Ruby --> "obj.m1.m2.m3" -- sweeet! > > Man, i must admit i really like this, and your code will look so much > > cleaner. > > How do you distinguish between calling a method with no arguments, and > getting access to the method object itself (because it _is_ an object, > y'know, it's OO all the way down...)?
I agree with alex here. Will take the explicit syntax over the extra cognitive load of figuring out exactly what's going on with `obj.m1.m2.m3`. Python has its warts, but requiring ()'s on function calls isn't one of them. :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
