kj wrote: > But this unfortunate situation is already possible, because one > can already define > > class C: > x = 1 > def foo(self): > print C.x > print self.x
How is this a problem? There is no ambiguity between the global scope and the local from within foo. >From within foo C is accessed from the global scope having not found it as a local. Once you have C C.x is just one step away. Variable self is local to function foo since it was passed in as a parameter from the method which wraps it. Variable self refers to a class instance which contains a dictionary. Variable x is absent from the instance dictionary so the class self.__class__ is referenced, again from local scope to find x. If it wasn't found there the superclasses would have been searched before throwing an attribute error. It seems to me, you are confusing instance creation with class creation. -- Stephen Fairchild -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
