On Nov 12, 2:37 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers <bdesth.quelquech...@free.quelquepart.fr> wrote:
> > Oh i get it now! If i assign a valid value to a variable the variable > > is also valid...thats...thats... GENUIS! *sarcasm* > > It's not about "assigning a valid value to a variable", it's about the > name being created (or not) in the current namespace, whatever it's > bound to. And thats what my sarcasm was alluding to. Steven's argument is moot because it will blow up either way due to the fact that "value" is non- existent! Every argument that has been brought forth about how this will break is just False and basically a bunch of FUD! It just garbage so you can discredit the idea. It's actually quite funny when someone as small as me can bring down the iron curtain of c.l.py. '''Mr. Gorbachev, Tear down this wall!''' How about one of you "esteemed" Pythonista's show me a real example where it will break. Show me (and the world) this H.G Wells nightmarish scenario you speak of but show no solid proofs. Sorry chaps, I don't buy snake oil! Going, Going, Gonnnne, out the park! PS: And if it were so dangerous why would someone as knowledgeable as Carl have stepped in and supported it. I think because (like me) Carl put's the language before sewing circles. I think it's just personal like all the times before, that's OK, i have very thick skin! If it's wrong for a good reason i will graciously accept that, but no one has proven it's non-worth, not yet! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
