On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:00:50 +0000, geremy condra wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano > <st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote: >> >>> Steven D'Aprano <st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> writes: >>>> DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is not cryptographically strong, and should not >>>> be used where high security is required. >>> >>> Certainly no one should never use obfuscate's rot13 function for high >>> security. Use at least double-rot13 instead, or maybe even quadruple >>> rot13 ;-). >> >> Ha ha, that's funny! I've never heard that one before! *wink* > > I think I lost a sarcasm detector to this line- are you being serious?
Possibly I overloaded your sarcasm detector and broke it. No, I'm not serious. If I had a dollar for every time somebody suggested using rot13 twice for extra security, I could buy out Microsoft. Hell, if I had a dollar for every time *I* suggested using rot13 twice, I could buy out Google. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
