On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Aahz <a...@pythoncraft.com> wrote: > In article <mailman.1734.1270954853.23598.python-l...@python.org>, > geremy condra <debat...@gmail.com> wrote: >>On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano >><st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote: >>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote: >>>> Steven D'Aprano <st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> writes: >>>>> >>>>> DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is not cryptographically strong, and should not >>>>> be used where high security is required. >>>> >>>> Certainly no one should never use obfuscate's rot13 function for high >>>> security. Use at least double-rot13 instead, or maybe even quadruple >>>> rot13 ;-). >>> >>> Ha ha, that's funny! I've never heard that one before! *wink* >> >>I think I lost a sarcasm detector to this line- are you being serious? > > There are people who have a .sig that says, "This message protected by > double-rot13 for extra security." It's an extremely common jape.
I work in infosec. I've heard it ;) Geremy Condra -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list