Terry Hancock wrote:
> *But you do have to remember that strings are documented under "sequences"
> this is probably my biggest complaint about the Library Reference ---
> something
> as important as string methods should have its own heading in the top-level
> outline. But that's a nitpick, of course.
I'd agree. My one complaint about the documentation, if I had one, would
be that the organizational structure is non-intuitive. ("Why are
dictionaries/lists/strings part of the 'library'?") But once you get the
organization down, I have few complaints.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
