On 6/1/2010 7:53 AM, Xavier Ho wrote: > > Out of curiosity, why are you defining two classes inside a > > function?
Not my code! Not my code! :-) This code was contributed by someone else, and I merely took my default action (in such cases) of running pyflakes, pychecker, and pylint on it before doing anything else, just to see what comes up. As far as I can tell the sole reason for that code being structured the way it is, is to provide a kind of module-within-a-module and not clutter up the outer module with these helper classes needed only by the foo() function. -- Leo Breebaart <l...@lspace.org> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
