genkuro wrote:
> Newbie here. I may be missing something obvious, in which case,
> please feel free to berate and laugh at me.
>
> Here's a dubious line of code:
> logging = logging.getLogger(__name__)
Dubious indeed. As a workaround you can import the module again, preferably
under another name:
import logging as real_logging_module
You can think of
import logging
as a shortcut for
logging = __import__("logging")
and of
import logging as x
as a shortcut for
x = __import__("logging")
> How can I refer to the original logging package "logging" after this
> statement is run? Specifically, I'm trying to add a log handler with
> logging.addHandler(x) and it is of course failing.
Hmm, this shouldn't fail, as there is a Logger.addHandler() method whereas
the logging module doesn't contain an addHandler() function:
>>> import logging
>>> logging.addHandler
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'addHandler'
>>> logging.getLogger().addHandler
<bound method RootLogger.addHandler of <logging.RootLogger instance at
0x7f06bdc71a28>>
Peter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
