"Martin v. Loewis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> writes: > > The point, one more time with feeling, is that the incompatibilities > > between 2.x and 3.x will *increase* over time. > > I think this is unfounded, and actually false.
Since many other people have responded with similar sentiments, I can only think I must have been expressing myself very poorly today. I agree with everything you say here, but it doesn't go against what I've been saying. If I cared about the issue more, I might have another crack at putting my meaning into words; but those who want to support a broad stride of Python versions are more motivated than I to figure it out, so instead I depart the field. -- \ “People's Front To Reunite Gondwanaland: Stop the Laurasian | `\ Separatist Movement!” —wiredog, http://kuro5hin.org/ | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list