On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jason Swails <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Robert Kern <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/11/10 11:44 AM, Jason Swails wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Robert Kern <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    On 10/11/10 8:44 AM, Jason Swails wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Andreas Waldenburger
>>>        <[email protected]>
>>>        wrote:
>>>
>>>            On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:51:46 +1300 Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>>>        <[email protected]_zealand> wrote:
>>>
>>>         > In message
>>> <[email protected]
>>>        <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>        <mailto:[email protected]
>>>        <mailto:[email protected]>>>,
>>>
>>>         > Emile van Sebille wrote:
>>>         >
>>>         > > Oh come now -- isn't being lazy a primary programmer's
>>> attribute?
>>>         >
>>>         > I wonder if that’s why more men are good at it than women...
>>>
>>>            You may want to think about whether this really was your
>>> intended
>>>            meaning.
>>>
>>>
>>>        Sure it was -- men are lazy; programmers are primarily lazy;
>>> explains why
>>>        programmers are predominantly men (for the time being, at least).
>>>  Made
>>>        perfect
>>>        sense to me.
>>>
>>>
>>>    That's quite a different statement than "men are more good at it than
>>> women".
>>>
>>>
>>> Since when have programmers argued semantics/syntax?
>>
>
> Correction: <sarcasm> Since when have programmers argued semantics/syntax?
> </sarcasm>
>
>>
>> It's *all* we argue about. That, and tabs vs. spaces.
>
> But tabs ARE spaces (specifically 3 of them), in a row ;)

<shudder>

Geremy Condra
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to