I personally would take only one bite at a time. Meaning only do one then do the other later. But to each it own :)
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:48:11 -0500 > To: python-list@python.org > From: jbiq...@icsmx.com > Subject: Re: Python 2.7 or 3.1 > > Hello all > > Would you consider a "not so intelligent move" for a newsbie to > Python to have maybe version 2.7 and 3.x (if that's possible to be > running together on the same machine) to have them run and be > learning mainly in 2.7 and see differences in 3.x? In my case I am > interested mainly in web applications with a database and if possible > being accesing dbase since a projects still runs a big system under > dbase format, or definitely stay with 2.7 for a while until most in > migrate it t o 3.x? > > Thanks in advance > Jorge Biquez > > At 05:21 p.m. 29/10/2010, geremy condra wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Braden Faulkner <brad...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Would it be safe to say that 2.6 would be even better for beginners than? > > > >Let me just come out with a contrary point of view before you go down > >that path. If you're seriously considering using sqlite, then you may > >be just as well off using Python3 as 2.7 or 2.6- it's in all of the > >above, and Python3 is a big cleanup over previous versions of the > >language. > > > >Geremy Condra > >-- > >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
