On Jan 16, 5:03 am, Tim Harig <user...@ilthio.net> wrote: > Personally, I think the time is ripe for a language that bridges the > gap between ease of use dynamic languages with the performance and > distribution capabilities of a full systems level language.
Bravo! > This is after > all the promise the VM based languages made but never really fulfilled. > It is also high time for a fully concurrent language fully capable of > taking advantage of multicore processors without having to deal with the > inherent dangers of threading. Bravissimo!!!!!! > There are several good choices available > for both a even a few that fit both bills; but, few of them have the > support of a company like Google that is capable of the push required > to move the language into the mainstream. Maybe. I have skimmed over Go and while it looks "somewhat" promising i always miss the batteries included and elegant syntax of Python. Of course the language is still young so i hope they plan to invest into it. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list