On 1/26/11 11:19 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: "Emile van Sebille"<em...@fenx.com>
...
Well, I didn't know this, and it is a valid reason.
This means that it is true that there is no enough maintainance force to
keep WxPython updated.
Did I understand correctly?
Not at all -- wxPython is an active funded ongoing project. Review the
roadmap at http://wiki.wxpython.org/TentativeRoadmap and particularly
the final paragraph on Python3.x support.
Emile
But somebody said that the core Python developers, or Guido said that WxPython
won't be included in the core distribution because it doesn't have a strong
team of maintainers... with other words but this was the idea.
No, you are misrepresenting what was said. What is required is that someone make
an active commitment to maintain wxPython as part of the standard library
*specifically*. That means that the package has to follow Python's release
cycle. The wxPython developers do not wish to do that. They can develop wxPython
much better outside of the standard library.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
