On Mar 6, 10:17 pm, n00m <n...@narod.ru> wrote: > On Mar 6, 8:55 pm, John Bokma <j...@castleamber.com> wrote: > > > > > n00m <n...@narod.ru> writes: > > >http://www.nga.gov/search/index.shtm > > >http://deyoung.famsf.org/search-collections > > > etc > > > Seems they all offer search only by keywords and this kind. > > > What about to submit e.g. roses2.jpg (copy) and to find its > > > original? Assume we don't know its author neither its title > > > Title: TinEye, author:http://ideeinc.com/ > > Search:http://www.tineye.com/ > > > Example: > > http://www.tineye.com/search/2b3305135fa4c59311ed58b41da5d07f213e4d47/ > > > Notice how it finds modified images. > > > -- > > John Bokma j3b > > > Blog:http://johnbokma.com/ Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/j.j.j.bokma > > Freelance Perl & Python Development:http://castleamber.com/ > > It's for kids. > Such trifles can easily be cracked by e.g. Jorgen Grahn's algo (see > his message)
Even his algo will be an overhead. Comparing meta-data/EXIF of image files will be enough in 99% cases. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
