> Objection! Does the defense REALLY expect this court to believe that > he can testify as to how MOST members of the Python community would or > would not favor bash over Python? And IF they do in fact prefer bash, > is this display of haughty arrogance nothing more than a hastily > stuffed straw-man presented to protect his own ego?
Double objection! Relevance. The point is that the OP created another language that is neither Python nor Bash. > And why do you need to voice such strong opinions of disdain in an > announcement thread? Testing the integrity of a module (or module) > author is fine so long as we are respectful whilst doing so. However, > i must take exception with your crass attitude. My respectful opinion is that the OP's approach is fundamentally flawed. There are many platform-specific issues when forking and threading are fused. My benign intent was to warn others about unsolved problems and scratching-your-head situations. Obviously, the OP can always choose to continue his direction at his own discretion. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
