On Feb 17, 1:49 pm, Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmic...@sequans.com> wrote:
> I can't use it though, I'm still using a vintage 2.5 version :-/ That's a shame. I chose 2.6 as a baseline for this package, because I need it to work on Python 2.x and 3.x with the same code base and minimal work, and that meant supporting Unicode literals via "from __future__ import unicode_literals". I'm stuck on 2.5 with other projects, so I share your pain :-( Regards, Vinay Sajip -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list