Evan Driscoll <[email protected]> wrote:
>So yes, you can say that pretending there's not a mapping of strings to
>internal representation is silly, because there is. However, there's
>nothing you can say about that mapping.
I'm not the one labeling anything as being silly. I'm the one labeling
the things as bullshit, and that's what you're doing here. I can in
fact say what the internal byte string representation of strings is any
given build of Python 3. Just because I can't say what it would be in
an imaginary hypothetical implementation doesn't mean I can never say
anything about it.
Ross Ridge
--
l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo] [email protected]
-()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/
db //
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
