On 2012-03-28, Ross Ridge <[email protected]> wrote: > Evan Driscoll <[email protected]> wrote: >> So yes, you can say that pretending there's not a mapping of >> strings to internal representation is silly, because there is. >> However, there's nothing you can say about that mapping. > > I'm not the one labeling anything as being silly. I'm the one > labeling the things as bullshit, and that's what you're doing > here. I can in fact say what the internal byte string > representation of strings is any given build of Python 3. Just > because I can't say what it would be in an imaginary > hypothetical implementation doesn't mean I can never say > anything about it.
I am in a similar situation viz a viz my wife's undergarments. -- Neil Cerutti -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
