On 23.07.2012 15:35, Chris Angelico wrote: > That said, though, there's good argument in allowing full Unicode in > *identifiers*. If I'm allowed to name something "foo", then a German > should be allowed to name something "foö". And since identifiers are > case sensitive (at least, they are in all good languages...), there > should be no issues with not having particular letters.
To you have a "ö" key on your keyboard? I have one. It wouldn't be a problem for me. Most English layouts probably don't. It would be annoying. If you allow for UTF-8 identifiers you'll have to be horribly careful what to include and what to exclude. Is the non-breaking space a valid character for a identifier? Technically it's a different character than the normal space, so why shouldn't it be? What an awesome idea! What about × vs x? Or Ì vs Í vs Î vs Ï vs Ĩ vs Ī vs ī vs Ĭ vs ĭ vs Į vs į vs I vs İ? Do you think if you need to maintain such code you'll immediately know the difference between the 13 (!) different "I"s I just happened to pull out randomly you need to chose and how to get it? What about Ȝ vs ȝ? Or Ȣ vs ȣ? Or ȸ vs ȹ? Or d vs Ԁ vs ԁ vs ԃ vs Ԃ? Or ց vs g? Or ս vs u? I've not even mentioned the different punctuation marks and already it's hell of a mess, although I just happened to look into a few pages. Having UTF-8 in identifiers is a horrible idea. It makes perfect sense to support it within strings (as Python3 does), but I would hate for Python to include them into identifiers. Then again, I'm pretty sure this is not planned anytime soon. Best regards, Henrik -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
