Few facts that doesn't make it less interesting: (1) the test source code available (2) the test itself is pretty famous (3) you can re-run it (4) or even better supply own that in your believe is 100% relevant
Not every project has problem with database performance. Some use caching... and pretty happy. In my case I have got 2x boost of web application performance just by switching to wheezy.template, that simple. Thanks. Andriy ---------------------------------------- > To: python-list@python.org > From: stefan...@behnel.de > Subject: Re: Fastest web framework > Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:50:20 +0200 > > Roy Smith, 23.09.2012 16:02: > > Andriy Kornatskyy wrote: > >> I have run recently a benchmark of a trivial 'hello world' application for > >> various python web frameworks (bottle,�django, flask, pyramid, web.py, > >> wheezy.web) hosted in uWSGI/cpython2.7 and gunicorn/pypy1.9... you might > >> find > >> it interesting: > >> > >> http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/09/python-fastest-web-framework.html > >> > >> Comments or suggestions are welcome. > > > > That's a nice comparison, thanks for posting it. > > > > One thing that's worth pointing out, however, is that in a real world > > application, as long as you're using something halfway decent, the speed > > of the framework is probably not going to matter at all. It's much more > > likely that database throughput will be the dominating factor. > > Yes, that makes the comparison (which may or may not be biased towards his > own engine) a bit less interesting. Worth keeping this in mind: > > http://www.codeirony.com/?p=9 > > Stefan > > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
