On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:26:19 -0400, Kevin Walzer wrote: > On 9/25/12 4:15 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I though this might be of interest. >> >> http://www.ironfroggy.com/software/i-am-worried-about-the-future-of- >> python >> >> > Interesting article, but the comments of those who say "the only > language I need to know is Python" strike me as a bit limited. If this > is the case, then Python can never be moved forward, because it is > written in C.
Incorrect. IronPython in C#. Jython is written in Java. CLPython is written in Lisp. Berp and HoPe are written in Haskell. Nuitka is written in C++. Skulpt is written in Javascript. Vyper is written in Ocaml. PyPy is written in RPython. Some of those Python compilers are obsolete, unmaintained or experimental. Others are not. But either way, it is certainly not true that Python is written in C. One specific Python compiler happens to be written in C, that is all. > I program in Python, C, Objective C, JavaScript, Tcl, AppleScript, and > I'm learning Perl. Python could *not* handle all the domains I target in > my projects. Unless you are writing code that operates on the bare metal (device drivers, operating system kernels) Python probably *could*, even if it doesn't *yet*. PyPy now allows you to write real-time video processing filters in pure Python: http://morepypy.blogspot.com.au/2011/07/realtime-image-processing-in-python.html And if performance was irrelevant, you could even write an operating system in Python. A really slow, painful operating system, but still an operating system. Given a sufficiently smart compiler, and sufficiently powerful libraries, or sufficiently low expectations, pretty much any programming language can do anything any other language can do. Almost all of them are Turing complete. But of course, in practice languages differ in their power and capabilities. > For instance: if I want to access Mac-native functionality > via Tkinter that isn't currently available in the library, That "isn't currently available" part is precisely what I'm talking about. Just because it's not available now doesn't mean it can't be made available. > I can understand loving the language and wanting to work just in the > language, but it's another thing entirely to call Python the One > Language to Rule Them All. (That's C, because all other languages are > implemented in it. :-) ) I see your smiley, but that is factually incorrect. Not all compilers or interpreters are written in C. Many languages are self-hosted, that is, they are written in themselves, using some clever bootstrapping techniques. C is neither the most powerful, the oldest, the best, or the most fundamental language around. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
